Introduction: Neurodivergent individuals are disproportionately confronted with psychological strain, social exclusion, and barriers to workplace participation. These challenges arise not from neurological differences per se but from normative demands, systemic ableism, and diagnosis-dependent support systems. Self-identification as neurodivergent may function as a protective resource by fostering resilience, reducing internalized stigma, and enabling authentic inclusion.


Purpose: The project investigates the relationship between neurodivergent self-identification and key psychological and occupational outcomes, including mental health, subjective well-being, masking/camouflaging, participation, and perceived workplace inclusion. The central aim is to understand whether and how self-chosen identity can buffer against stress and contribute to sustainable occupational health.


Method: A mixed-methods design will be employed. In the qualitative phase, semi-structured interviews will explore lived experiences of self-identification, coping strategies, and perceptions of inclusion. In the quantitative phase, a survey will be conducted using a developed instrument to capture neurodiversity and self-identification. Planned analyses include examining relationship between self-identification and measures of mental health, masking, and participation.


Hypotheses: It is expected that self-identification will be positively associated with psychological well-being, self-acceptance, and perceived inclusion, while being negatively associated with masking and psychological strain. At the same time, structural barriers in precarious labor contexts are assumed to limit these protective effects.


Conclusions: By focusing on self-identification as a psychosocial resource, this project highlights new pathways for inclusive organizational practices, occupational health promotion, and participation beyond clinical diagnostic frameworks.