What happens to psychological contracts after a violation? Theoretical work has identified four psychological contract (PC) states capturing how individuals respond in the aftermath of a violation. However, these ideas have not been empirically examined. To address this issue, we develop and validate a measure of post-violation contract states (PVCS). We then take a profile-based approach using latent profile analysis (LPA) to investigate post-violation psychological contract profiles (Phase 1) and their differential impacts on outcomes (Phase 2). In Phase 1, using two independent samples (from the UK and USA), we found and replicated four profiles: deteriorated, compromised, recovering, and flourishing PCs. Moreover, in the second sample, a new profile emerged: PCs in renegotiation. In Phase 2, we found that these profiles differentially predicted relevant work outcomes commonly used in PC research, including organizational membership (identity and identity loss), social exchange (gratitude and relative deprivation), performance (proactive behaviors and silence), and attitudes (turnover intention). Our study expands and complements research that uses variable-centered approaches by revealing new theoretical and practical insights into psychological contracts.