Introduction
Although bereavement is commonly associated with the death of a human loved one, it can also result from other significant losses, such as the end of a romantic relationship or the death of a companion animal. For many pet owners, the bond with their animal is strong enough for the pet to be seen as a family member. Yet, society often fails to recognize the depth of grief that accompanies pet loss. This study explores whether grief intensity and meaning reconstruction differ between those who experienced human loss and those who lost a pet.


Method
The study included individuals who lost a loved one (n=133) or a pet (n=316), with no significant differences in age or time since loss. Data were collected using the Turkish versions of the Traumatic Grief Inventory-Self Report and the Grief and Meaning Reconstruction Inventory (GMRI), which assesses four grief-related dimensions: growth, meaninglessness-emptiness, continuing bonds, and peace.


Results
Independent sample t-test results showed significantly higher grief levels in participants with human loss (M=65.33) compared to those with pet loss (M=57.74), (t(447)=4.76, p<.001). However, levels of growth and peace did not differ significantly between the groups. Hierarchical regression analysis revealed that, after controlling for demographic factors (e.g. age, gender, education, time since), the type of loss significantly predicted levels of traumatic grief, meaninglessness, continuing bonds, and peace. Nevertheless, the type of loss explained only a small portion (1-5%) of the variance in these outcomes. Growth was not significantly affected by loss type.


Conclusion
While the type of loss influences certain aspects of grief, its overall effect is limited. Therefore, consistent with previous studies, pet loss appears to trigger a profound grieving process for individuals, similar to human loss. It is essential for clinical practice to acknowledge this reality and recognize pet loss as a legitimate and meaningful form of bereavement.