Meta-Analytical reviews of personnel selection reviews based on delusions were compared with Artificial Intelligence reviews with their hallucinations.
An Artificial Intelligence database of over 100,000 full text documents was used to identify alternative selection procedures, and compare the results with all major personnel selection meta-analyses. This included the major personnel selection meta-analyses cited by I/O experts in U.S. class action discrimination law suits.
The focus was upon alternative selection procedures advocated by expert witnesses. Experts cited a core number of highly cited personnel selection meta-analyses. The meta-analyses were used as the scientific basis for testimony that alternative selection procedures had equivalent validity to cognitive tests with less adverse impact. Alternative tests included personality traits, achievement records, physical ability, bio data, and situational judgement. Meta-analysis results were compared with Artificial Intelligence results. The comparisons included transparency, verification, replication, primary validity studies, adverse impact, and U.S. court decisions. Based on the results, the future of artificial intelligence was compared with meta-analyses.