1686 - TOOLS ASSESSING THE CORE RESOURCES OF THE HYBRID WORK: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

Session: P_D01S007 - Poster Session 7 - Division 1
AUTHORS:
Bravo Archibaldo (Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail (IRSST) ~ Montréal ~ Canada) , Negrini Alessia (Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail (IRSST) ~ Montréal ~ Canada) , Nauche Bénédicte (Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail (IRSST) ~ Montréal ~ Canada) , Cournoyer Laurence (Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal (CR-IUSMM) ~ Montréal ~ Canada) , Nadeau-Tremblay Juliette (Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal (CR-IUSMM) ~ Montréal ~ Canada) , Corbière Marc (Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM) ~ Montréal ~ Canada)
Abstract text:
Introduction: In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the possibility of doing hybrid work (i.e., working on-site at the employer's location and remotely from home). This can contribute to promoting work-life balance. However, it could also be associated with health problems, such as stress and mental fatigue. Some core resources of the hybrid work (i.e., functional remote workstations, agile offices within the organization, flex-time, and engaging management) could facilitate performance and prevent health problems among workers. Therefore, it is essential to have validated tools for assessing these core resources.


Purpose: The objective of this study is to identify the validated tools existing to evaluate the four core resources of hybrid work, which can promote worker health and prevent psychological health issues, mental disorders and/or musculoskeletal disorders.


Method: A systematic review of the scientific literature is conducted to identify the tools assessing the four core resources of hybrid work. The target publications are quantitative studies published between 2005 and 2025, and available in English, French, Spanish, or Italian. The databases PsycInfo, Medline, and Scopus are used. The PRISMA guidelines for reporting systematic reviews are followed.


Results: The identified tools in the selected studies will be classified according to the four core resources of hybrid work. In addition, the reported psychometric (e.g., internal consistency) and practical (e.g., time administration) properties of these tools will be reported as well.


Conclusion: Recommendations regarding the use of these tools in research and into prevention programs will be made based on their qualities. The identified tools could be used to recognize and promote quality hybrid working conditions to improve workers' health and performance.