Antonia Fitzpatrick (2017) states that the debate on the truth of human nature was made in context of the disputes on the resurrection of bodies after death starting from the Jesus bodies´ resurrection (1,15) especially in times of Peter Lombard and then Thomas from Aquin. The problem was how the body recovers its integrity after the corruption of death. The discussion will need three councils to become cleared and-apparently- accepted. This means that the individuality goes in an individuated body, not in a composed mode, nor in two pieces. These topics may have today as well a great significance, especially, in contexts of discussions on anthropology and gender studies. They are also a powerful inspiration of theological thought ontranshumanism and posthumanism. Of course, it impacts also our view on cosmology and environment. Nature is one of the most complex notions in the history of philosophy. The principal question is if what was translated from the Greek ousia/physis to Latin nature/substantia could be applied to both organic and non-organic entes (to humans and the environment) avoiding the dualist implicit anthropocentric hierarchy. From this starting point, passing through Paul and finishing in Revelation book, the bodies in nature mean different realities than some traditions have perpetuated. These give us some new inputs on the sources of the self (Taylor, Lang) that could only be recognized from the perspective of future resurrection. This paper would make a short account on the different interpretations of some traditions from the perspective of future resurrection about bodies, especially, queer bodies, in hope these could change our environmental paradigms of sustainability and ontology.