This paper critiques the theological justification for the devotional practice of offering human suffering for souls in Purgatory, arguing that it offers a twisted image of the Trinity. This typical Roman Catholic devotion of offering one's sufferings, usually related to bodily ailments, for the souls in Purgatory is exemplified through the testimonies of various saints, such as Catheriné Labouré and Padre Pio. While this practice appears to be unproblematic, allowing people to find meaning or value in their sufferings in relation to God, it impacts our understanding of the Trinity. In this paper, I will use Pope John Paul II's apostolic letter Salvifici Doloris (1984) and Pope Benedict XVI's encyclical Spe Salvi (2007) as the official stance of the Roman Catholic Magisterium on redemptive human suffering and the related practice of offering bodily sufferings. First, I will demonstrate how both Popes theologically justify this devotion through the benefits of personal and inter-relational outcomes in both this world and the next. Second, I will elaborate on how this theological vision of redemptive human suffering presents a seemingly spiritually rich concept of love between humans, which emulates Trinitarian love. Third, I will problematize the theological justification of the devotion by exposing three potential consequences that can arise, affecting the Trinity: a) the efficacy of Christ's death and sufferings, b) a Father figure who desires or requires human suffering for salvation, and c) the limitation of the Holy Spirit's action to specific interpretations of bodily experiences. If all three persons of the Trinity are called into question, we lose the cohesion within Love, leaving humans with nothing to emulate. Therefore, a theological reformulation of the relationship between human suffering and God is crucial for Trinitarian theology; otherwise, we risk sacrificing a specific understanding of Love.