Panel: UNITY AND DIFFERENTIATION. INQUIRING NON-DUALISM AS INTERDISCIPLINARY PARADIGM



644_2.2 - THE LOST DUALITY FROM THE INDIVIDUAL TO THE COLLECTIVE. A CASE STUDY IN THE RELIGIOUS DOMAIN

AUTHORS:
Hejazi S. (Bruno Kessler Foundation ~ Trento ~ Italy)
Text:
When applied to the religious domain, the distinction between individual (micro) and collective (macro) scales helps clarify the persistent tension between personal spirituality and organized religion. Collective displays of religion—rituals, institutions, public symbols, and codified doctrines—are often interpreted as direct expressions of individual belief. This interpretation, however, overlooks a fundamental shift in scale. As with other complex phenomena, the passage from individual spirituality to organized religion entails a change in descriptive regime rather than a simple aggregation of personal convictions. At the individual level, religious belief is shaped by inward experience, doubt, interpretation, and the superposition of beliefs. These dimensions are largely opaque to external observation and resist standardization. At the collective level, religion becomes visible primarily through regularities and patterns: shared practices and rituals, institutional continuity, and public displays or performances. What is rendered observable is not belief itself, but stabilized patterns of human gathering that can persist independently of the inner states of participants, and therefore repeat and endure across space and time. In contemporary European societies, where a progressive withdrawal of religion from the public sphere can be observed, the study and measurement of religion become statistically less accessible to social scientists. The apparent decline or transformation of religion does not, however, necessarily reflect a disappearance of belief. Rather, it indicates a shift in the scale at which belief is enacted and made visible—or measurable. The gap between individual spirituality and organized religion should therefore not be framed as a crisis of belief tout court, but understood in relation to the changing conditions of observability that shape this social phenomenon.