This paper examines how high-demand religious communities construct and regulate moral subjectivity through discursive regimes that emphasize productivity, discipline, and continuous self-improvement. Rather than focusing on overt forms of coercion, the analysis explores subtle normative frameworks through which commitment, obedience, and spiritual effort are framed as moral imperatives tied to personal worth and communal recognition. Drawing on qualitative research conducted among contemporary Christian and charismatic groups, the paper analyzes recurring moral narratives that position religious life as a project of ongoing optimization. Particular attention is given to evaluative vocabularies of growth, maturity, and responsibility, as well as to temporal framings that emphasize acceleration, urgency, and constant progression. These discursive patterns shape how individuals assess themselves and others, producing internalized standards of moral adequacy and failure. The paper further investigates how such moral regimes are sustained through the interaction of language, ritual participation, and everyday practices, fostering forms of self-governance aligned with collective expectations. Rather than external enforcement, moral regulation operates through self-monitoring, peer comparison, and narrative accountability. In post-membership accounts, former participants retrospectively reinterpret these moral frameworks, describing processes of cognitive distancing and re-evaluation of moral value beyond religious productivity. By combining perspectives from religious studies, discourse analysis, and sociological approaches to moral regulation, the paper contributes to discussions on normativity, subject formation, and the management of commitment in contemporary religious movements.