Can attention be a moral demand? Drawing on Bernhard Waldenfels' understanding of attention as both pathos and response, the paper conceptualizes a theological ethics of attention as oriented toward interruption, sensitization, and the capacity to see with the eyes of the other. It distinguishes three interrelated forms of attention: (1) as a quasi-automatic event; (2) as individual effort and ethical struggle; and (3) as structurally conditioned, dependent on societal and institutional arrangements. Together, these forms reveal attention as a contested practice in which agency is constantly negotiated—especially from the perspective of the disadvantaged and those rendered invisible. Finally, the paper conceptualizes attention as oriented toward interruption, sensitization, and the capacity to see with the eyes of the other.