Religious differences among the participants is expected, welcomed and required in interreligious dialogues. In many ways, the presence of religious difference is constituting such an activity. In certain conceptualizations of interreligious dialogue, it seems that religious difference is highlighted and privileged as the most significant human difference. Sometimes these dialogues establish religious identity or affiliation as the most salient and prominent part of people's lives. We know that sometimes religious communities encourage this, but what we often don't reflect over is how this may influence the dynamics and impact of interreligious dialogues. Religious communities of Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Buddhism and Hinduism have traditionally privileged men over women regarding leadership roles, as well as in the question of personal autonomy where women's possibilities have been restricted. What may happen when religious traditions meet and overlook gender differences when privileging religious differences, is that this may confirm and strengthen an already existing patriarchal communal practice. In this paper, I will discuss two models of interreligious dialogue and show the possible consequences for women. One is "Dialogue of confirmation", where the participant religions are not challenged regarding their practice (or lack of practice) of gender justice, and other human differences other than religious differences are not signified. The second is "Dialogue of challenge", where gender differences and gender justice are actively reflected upon and accepted as important, and the perspective is more intersectional and power critical. In the presentation, I will draw on Jeannine Hill Fletcher's chapter "Women in Interreligious Dialogue" from 2013 and my own monograph from 2016, Gender Justice in Muslim-Christian Readings.