The publication of Fiducia supplicans (2023) generated substantial polarization both in the media and within the Church. Although the document does not alter the Church's theological teaching on marriage, its pastoral emphasis on the possibility of blessing couples in "irregular relationships" was interpreted by many secular media platforms as a fundamental shift in the Catholic Church's stance on LGBT issues. This paper examines how media framing shaped public interpretations of the document and how different types of media (conservative, liberal, and religious) employed contrasting narratives, ranging from a frame of "threat to tradition" to one of "historic change." The analysis also explores how media use language and emotion when presenting the document. Different media sources highlight different aspects of the text and of the Pope's statements, producing interpretations that diverge significantly from the original pastoral intention. The paper argues that media logic can profoundly influence how the public understands the Church's approach to sensitive questions and, ultimately, contribute to increasing cultural and ethical polarization in contemporary public discourse.