On the demographic problem of divine hiddenness, the uneven distribution of theistic belief disconfirms the existence of an all-loving God (Stephen Maitzen 2006). If God is all-loving and wants a loving relationship with every human individual, then one should not expect theistic belief to be concentrated in some geographical regions and not others—yet such is the world. Naturalistic explanations, the problem goes, are more suited for explaining this uneven distribution. To meet this problem, Max Baker-Hytch (2016) has argued that in order to bring about certain goods (e.g., moral and intellectual virtues) God has created humans such that they mutually depend on one another for knowledge and beliefs, including belief in God, and the uneven distribution of theistic belief is a byproduct of this. Andrew Blanton (2025) in reply has argued that there are possible worlds in which humans are not significantly dependent on one another for theistic belief but are nonetheless dependent on one another for other kinds of knowledge in a way that preserves the aforementioned goods and others (e.g., free will). This paper will examine the possible implications if theistic belief were evenly distributed demographically. It will argue that if theistic belief were more evenly distributed but infrequent, then there might be fewer people with theistic belief overall than there would be if theistic belief were unevenly distributed but concentrated in certain regions. On the other hand, if theistic belief were more evenly distributed and frequent, it would prevent the obtaining of the goods mentioned above. And so to prevent such undesirable consequences, God might prefer to create a world where theistic belief is unevenly distributed. The resulting position provides an important challenge to Blanton, and while it is consistent and complementary to Baker-Hytch's position, it need not rely on it.