Contemporary discussions of difference often rely on rigid binary oppositions in which unity and distinction appear mutually exclusive. Such either/or logics tend to flatten the complexity of relational realities and contribute to increasingly polarized ways of interpreting social, philosophical, and theological questions. Within the Christian intellectual tradition, however, several thinkers have developed more nuanced frameworks for understanding opposition as a dynamic relation rather than a static contradiction. Among them, Erich Przywara articulated a distinctive account of polarity through his interpretation of the analogia entis. For Przywara, the relation between God and creation unfolds as a rhythmic tension between similarity and ever greater dissimilarity (similitudo - maior dissimilitudo). Being itself is therefore structured not by static identity but by a dynamic oscillation that holds unity and difference in productive tension. This paper proposes to extend Przywara's insight by placing it in dialogue with the concept of tensegrity, originally developed in architectural theory by Buckminster Fuller. In tensegrity structures, stability is achieved not by eliminating tension but by distributing it across a relational system in which opposing forces mutually sustain the integrity of the whole. Interpreted as a conceptual metaphor, tensegrity offers a fruitful way of rearticulating Przywara's analogical ontology. By situating this perspective in conversation with broader traditions of polarity, including the reflections of Romano Guardini and the notion of coincidentia oppositorum associated with Nicholas of Cusa, the paper argues that opposition can be understood as a generative structure of reality rather than a destructive conflict.