Recent developments in artificial intelligence have intensified debates concerning the nature of creativity, cognition, and the uniqueness of human rationality. Systems capable of generating sophisticated musical compositions raise a fundamental philosophical and theological question: can algorithmic systems genuinely create, or do they merely simulate human creative activity? This paper addresses this question from the perspective of the Thomistic philosophical tradition. The objective of the paper is twofold: first, to assess whether the emergence of AI-generated music challenges the Thomistic account of intellect and creativity; and second, to examine the social and economic implications of algorithmic cultural production for the dignity of human creative labor. Methodologically, the study adopts a philosophical-theological approach that combines conceptual analysis of key Thomistic notions—such as intellectus, ars, and the immaterial character of intellectual cognition—with a critical examination of contemporary AI music systems as a concrete case study. The paper argues that AI-generated music represents a form of algorithmic cultural production that, while technically sophisticated, does not constitute genuine creativity. Within the Aristotelian-Thomistic framework, authentic creative acts presuppose intellectual abstraction, intentionality, and rational agency. AI systems, by contrast, generate musical outputs through statistical pattern processing rather than understanding. From this perspective, Thomistic anthropology offers conceptual resources for distinguishing simulated creativity from human artistic activity and for reaffirming the dignity of creative labor in the age of artificial intelligence.