Simone Weil is regarded as a thinker who uniquely combines radical social critique with Christian mysticism. This paper challenges that reading by arguing that the political radicality of her thought is ultimately neutralized rather than deepened by a spirituality of necessity. While Weil offers a powerful analysis of modern uprootedness, factory labor, and oppression, her response to these conditions does not lie in the political transformation of social relations but in a mystical formation of the subject. Through attention, decreation, and consent to necessity, suffering redefines personally experienced subjugation as metaphysical necessity and shifts the locus of emancipation from collective struggle to individual spiritual resolution. Drawing on Weil's reflections on work, affliction, and divine order, I argue that her mysticism functions as a form of political theology in which power and domination are not abolished but bypassed through mystical knowledge of God. The worker is not called to contest the structures that generate exploitation but to recognize them as expressions of a necessary order that demands spiritual consent. Mysticism thus becomes a substitute for politics: it preserves the experience of suffering while simultaneously depriving it of political intelligibility. I thus read her in dialogue with Johann Baptist Metz's critique of "bourgeois religion" and his notion of a "hope without expectation." In my view, Weil's theology lacks an eschatological horizon capable of sustaining genuine historical openness. Approaching Weil through the lens of political theology does not deny the significance or spiritual depth of her thought, but it does call into question the widespread assumption that her mysticism can ground a politics of resistance. Instead, it reveals a theopolitical logic that risks sanctifying social suffering by embedding it within a metaphysical economy of order, obedience, and consent; thereby neutralizing political struggle.